1.NITI Aayog Report on Revitalizing Apprenticeship Ecosystem 2.Cybercrime in India 3.US Supreme Court Blocks Trump’s IEEPA Tariffs on Trade Partners 4. PAC Flags Poor Implementation of SANKALP Scheme After CAG Audit 5.India Unveils Sovereign AI Models at India AI Impact Summit 2026

1.NITI Aayog Report on Revitalizing Apprenticeship Ecosystem

Why in News?

• NITI Aayog has released a policy report titled “Revitalizing Apprenticeship Ecosystem: Insights, Challenges, Recommendations and Best Practices.”
• The report aims to position apprenticeships as a strategic pillar for human capital development and the realization of Viksit Bharat @2047.

What is the Report About

The report provides a comprehensive review of India’s apprenticeship ecosystem and proposes 20 action-oriented recommendations structured across five pillars:

1. Policy reforms
2. Structural strengthening
3. State and district-level interventions
4. Industry engagement
5. Aspirant support mechanisms

It also proposes the creation of an Apprenticeship Engagement Index to benchmark state performance and promote competitive federalism

Key Data and Trends

• State ConcentrationApprenticeship engagement is heavily concentrated, with Gujarat accounting for over 24% of total engagements under NAPS in FY 2024–25.
• Regional ImbalanceMany states and Union Territories contribute less than 0.001% of national apprenticeship engagements.
• Top Performing StatesGujarat, Maharashtra, Haryana, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka dominate participation.
• Demographic ContextA significant share of unemployed youth possess higher education qualifications but lack industry-ready skills.
• Rural PotentialLinking rural apprenticeships with bio-energy from agricultural residues could generate up to 18,000 MW of power annually.

Importance of a Strong Apprenticeship Ecosystem

• Apprenticeships connect academic education with practical industrial exposure.
• The “learning-by-doing” model makes youth job-ready and improves labour market outcomes.
• Industries benefit from semi-skilled workers familiar with operational processes.
• Provides structured employment pathways for rural and marginalized youth.
• Aligns skill certifications with international standards to facilitate labour mobility.

Key Challenges

• Cultural preference for academic degrees over vocational careers discourages enrollment.
• Industrial concentration in a few states creates unequal opportunities.
• Multiple schemes (NAPS and NATS) and compliance procedures deter MSMEs.
• District-level training capacity and institutional support remain uneven
• Rapid technological shifts (AI, digitalization) outpace updates in apprenticeship curricula.

Existing Institutional Framework

NEP 2020: Mainstreams vocational education within school and higher education systems.National Apprenticeship Promotion Scheme (NAPS): Provides financial incentives to employers and shares stipend costs.National Apprentice Training Scheme (NATS): Targets graduate and diploma holders.District Skill Committees:Decentralized structures to align local skill needs with implementation.

Conclusion

The NITI Aayog report highlights that apprenticeships are central to converting India’s demographic potential into a demographic dividend.

Addressing regional disparities, reducing regulatory complexity and aligning training with emerging technologies are critical for building a globally competitive workforce.

A revitalized apprenticeship ecosystem will strengthen industrial productivity, enhance employability and support inclusive growth — essential pillars of Viksit Bharat 2047.

Prelims Question

Q. With reference to India’s apprenticeship ecosystem, consider the following statements:

1. The National Apprenticeship Promotion Scheme (NAPS) provides financial incentives to employers engaging apprentices.
2. The National Apprentice Training Scheme (NATS) is exclusively meant for school-level vocational trainees.
3. The NITI Aayog report proposes an Apprenticeship Engagement Index to benchmark state performance.

How many of the above statements are correct?

(a) Only one(b) Only two(c) Only three(d) None

Answer: (b)(Statement 2 is incorrect.)

Mains Question (GS Paper 2 – Human Resource Development)

Q.“Apprenticeships are critical to bridging the gap between education and employment in India.”

Discuss the structural challenges in India’s apprenticeship ecosystem and evaluate the key reforms proposed by NITI Aayog to strengthen human capital development.

2.Cybercrime in India

Why in News?

• The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) reported a 24% surge in cybercrime cases in 2025, with total losses amounting to ₹22,495 crore.
• A major concern is the rise of organized investment scams, accounting for over 75% of total financial losses.

What is Cybercrime?

Cybercrime refers to criminal activities conducted using computers, digital devices, networks, or the internet.

In India, cybercrime has evolved from basic phishing and OTP fraud to sophisticated crimes such as:

• AI-driven impersonation• Digital arrest scams• Sextortion rackets• Investment and trading fraud• Ransomware attacks• Financial mule account networks

It poses threats to individuals, businesses, financial institutions, and critical infrastructure.

Key Data and Trends (2025)

Case Volume28.15 lakh cases recorded in 2025 (up from 22.68 lakh in 2024).Financial Loss₹22,495 crore lost in 2025 (slightly lower than 2024 due to improved intervention mechanisms).Investment ScamsAccount for 76% of total money lost and 35% of reported cases.Emerging ThreatsDigital arrest scams – 9% of losses.Sextortion – 4% of losses.Recovery MechanismsIndian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) has blocked transactions worth over ₹8,000 crore.

Reasons for Rising Cybercrime

• Rapid Internet Penetration: With widespread smartphone and UPI adoption, the digital attack surface has expanded to rural India.
• Economic Vulnerability: High inflation and desire for quick returns make citizens susceptible to fake investment schemes.
• AI and Deepfake Technology: Generative AI is used to clone voices, create fake police video calls, and impersonate officials.
• Cross-Border Scam Networks: Organized cyber fraud operations based in Southeast Asia target Indian citizens.
• Digital Banking Awareness Gaps: Many users are unaware of security protocols in UPI and online banking.
• Psychological Manipulation: Criminals exploit fear (digital arrest), greed (investment scams), and shame (sextortion).

Challenges in Controlling Cybercrime

• Low FIR Conversion :Large number of complaints but relatively low number of formal investigations.
• Jurisdictional Complexity: Crimes often span multiple states and countries.
• Technical Sophistication: Use of VPNs, encrypted networks, cryptocurrency and ransomware-as-a-service models.
• Forensic Capacity Gap:Shortage of trained cyber forensic experts at district and police station levels.
• Social Stigma: Victims hesitate to report sextortion and online harassment.
• Critical Infrastructure Risks: Hospitals, banks and power grids face ransomware and data breach threats.
• Legal and Institutional Framework:Information Technology Act, 2000 (amended 2008) – Primary legal framework for cyber offences.
• Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) – Nodal agency under MHA.
• National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal – Online complaint mechanism.
• Helpline 1930 – Real-time reporting and transaction blocking for financial cyber frauds.
• National Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Centre (NCIIPC) – Protects critical digital infrastructure.

Way Forward

A comprehensive and coordinated strategy is required to address the growing challenge of cybercrime. A mandatory e-FIR mechanism should be introduced to ensure that all digital complaints are legally registered and traceable. AI-based fraud detection systems must be deployed to proactively identify suspicious transactions and mule accounts. International cooperation needs to be strengthened through closer collaboration with global and regional agencies to dismantle offshore scam hubs. Cyber forensic infrastructure should be expanded by upgrading laboratories and training police personnel at grassroots levels in digital investigation.

Conclusion

Cybercrime in India has evolved into an organized and psychologically driven economic threat. While real-time interventions have improved recovery rates, the rising scale and sophistication demand a shift from reactive enforcement to preventive digital resilience.

A coordinated strategy combining technology, regulation, awareness, and international diplomacy is essential for building a Cyber-Surakshit Bharat.

Prelims Question

Q. With reference to cybercrime regulation in India, consider the following statements:

1. The Information Technology Act, 2000 provides legal provisions for hacking and identity theft.
2. The Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) functions under the Ministry of Home Affairs.
3. The 1930 helpline is used for reporting financial cyber fraud for immediate transaction blocking.

How many of the above statements are correct?

(a) Only one(b) Only two(c) Only three(d) None

Answer: (c)

Mains Question

Q.Cybercrime in India is increasingly organized, AI-driven and cross-border in nature. Discuss the emerging trends in cybercrime and examine the institutional and policy measures required to strengthen India’s cyber security ecosystem.

3.US Supreme Court Blocks Trump’s IEEPA Tariffs on Trade Partners

Why in News?

• On 21 February 2026, the Supreme Court of the United States (6–3 majority) ruled that President Donald Trump did not have authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose sweeping tariffs on trade partners.
• The judgment struck down the “Liberation Day” tariffs announced on 2 April 2025.

Background of the Case

Trump’s Justification for Invoking IEEPA

In April 2025, through an executive order titled “Liberation Day”, Trump declared a national emergency, citing:

• Harmful foreign trade and economic practices• Lack of reciprocity in trade relationships• Economic threats to US manufacturing and employment

He attempted to use IEEPA as a legal basis to impose blanket tariffs on imports.

About IEEPA

Purpose: Enacted in 1977, IEEPA grants the US President emergency powers to deal with:

• Unusual or extraordinary foreign threats• National security risks• Economic and foreign policy crises

Scope of Powers

IEEPA allows:

• Freezing foreign assets• Imposing economic sanctions• Restricting financial transactions• Controlling imports and exports

However, it does not explicitly authorize broad-based tariff imposition without Congressional approval.

Historical Context

• Enacted under President Jimmy Carter in 1977• Replaced the Trading with the Enemy Act• Used primarily for sanctions (e.g., Iran hostage crisis 1979)• As of September 2025, 77 national emergencies declared under IEEPA (46 ongoing)

Supreme Court Verdict

Key Findings:

• IEEPA does not grant the President unilateral tariff authority• Trade policy and tariff powers lie primarily with Congress under the US Constitution• Broad economic tariffs require explicit legislative backing

Implications:

• “Liberation Day” tariffs declared invalid• IEEPA cannot be used as a blanket trade weapon• Reassertion of Congressional control over tariff policy• Reinforces checks and balances in US governance

Alternative Legal Routes for Tariffs

The ruling does not eliminate all presidential trade tools. Other statutory provisions include:

1. Section 122 – Trade Act, 1974Temporary tariffs (up to 15% for 150 days)
2. Section 338 – Tariff Act, 1930Tariffs up to 50% on discriminatory trade practices
3. Section 232 – Trade Expansion Act, 1962National security-based import restrictions(Previously used for steel and aluminium tariffs)
4. Section 301 – Trade Act, 1974Action against unfair foreign trade practices

Refund Question: Will the US Return Tariff Revenue?

Revenue Generated: IEEPA tariffs reportedly generated approximately $142 billion in 2025 (US Customs & Border Protection).

Legal Position:The Supreme Court invalidated the tariffs but did not automatically mandate refunds.

Possible Outcome

• Importers may seek refunds• A substantial portion of the revenue could be returned• Refund process likely complex due to customs procedures and litigation

Global Implications

• Impact on Global Trade: The verdict may ease trade tensions and restore predictability in US trade policy.
• Impact on India: Indian exporters affected by 2025 tariffs may benefit if trade normalizes and refunds materialize.
• Policy Signal: Strengthens rule-based trade governance and reinforces that emergency powers cannot override legislative authority in economic policymaking.

Significance for International Relations

• Reasserts constitutional separation of powers in US trade policy• Signals limits to unilateral economic nationalism• May influence future trade negotiations and WTO disputes• Impacts global supply chains and tariff stability

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s ruling is not merely about tariffs—it is about constitutional authority and limits of executive power.

By restricting the use of IEEPA for blanket tariffs, the Court has reaffirmed Congressional primacy in trade policy and restored institutional checks in economic governance.

For global trade partners, including India, the decision brings greater predictability and signals a potential recalibration of US trade strategy.

Prelims Question

Q.With reference to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), consider the following statements:

1. It was enacted in 1977 to replace the Trading with the Enemy Act.
2. It explicitly authorizes the US President to impose tariffs without Congressional approval.
3. It has been used historically to impose economic sanctions.

How many of the above statements are correct?

(a) Only one(b) Only two(c) Only three(d) None

Answer: (b)

Mains Question-

Q.The use of emergency economic powers has significant implications for global trade governance. Discuss the constitutional and geopolitical implications of the US Supreme Court’s ruling on the use of IEEPA for imposing tariffs.

4.PAC Flags Poor Implementation of SANKALP Scheme After CAG Audit

Why in News?

On 21 February 2026, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) criticised the poor implementation of the SANKALP Scheme after a report by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) flagged financial underutilisation and weak monitoring.

Key Findings of the CAG Report

Financial Underutilisation

• Only 44% of allocated funds were disbursed between 2017–18 and 2023–24.• Indicates systemic inefficiencies in fund deployment.

Weak Monitoring & Institutional Preparedness

• Of ₹1,606.15 crore disbursed by the World Bank, only ₹850.71 crore was utilised.• Suggests non-preparedness at implementing levels and inadequate oversight mechanisms.

Delay in Implementation

• Originally scheduled to end in March 2023.• Extended to March 2024 due to slow progress.

About SANKALP SchemeWhat is SANKALP?SANKALP (Skill Acquisition and Knowledge Awareness for Livelihood Promotion) is a World Bank-assisted programme aimed at strengthening India’s skill development ecosystem.Nodal MinistryImplemented by the Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship.

Launch• Approved: October 2017• Launched: 19 January 2018• Total Outlay: ₹4,455 croreObjectives• Improve quality of short-term skill training• Strengthen institutional capacity at State and District levels• Enhance industry linkages• Promote inclusion of SC/ST, women and marginalized communities

About the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG)

Constitutional Status: Established under Article 148 of the Constitution of India.Appointment & Tenure• Appointed by the President• Tenure: 6 years or until age 65Removal: Similar process as that of a Supreme Court judgeRole:• Audits receipts and expenditure of Union and State governments• Submits audit reports to Parliament and State Legislatures• Ensures financial accountability and transparencyAppointment & Tenure:• Appointed by the President• Tenure: 6 years or until age 65Removal: Similar process as that of a Supreme Court judgeRole• Audits receipts and expenditure of Union and State governments• Submits audit reports to Parliament and State Legislatures• Ensures financial accountability and transparency

About the Public Accounts Committee (PAC)

Origin: First introduced in 1921 under the Government of India Act, 1919.Composition• 22 Members• 15 from Lok Sabha• 7 from Rajya Sabha• Elected annually• Chairperson appointed by the Lok Sabha SpeakerFunctions:• Examines CAG audit reports• Scrutinises public expenditure• Ensures money granted by Parliament is spent properlyNature:• Advisory body• Cannot enforce decisions directly• Plays a key role in parliamentary financial oversight

Governance Concerns Raised

• Financial Inefficiency: Underutilisation weakens impact of skill development programmes.
• Institutional Weakness: Poor monitoring mechanisms reflect coordination gaps between Centre and States.
• Opportunity Cost: Funds from international institutions like the World Bank remain unproductive.
• Skill Gap Persistence: Delayed implementation undermines India’s demographic dividend strategy.

Broader Implications

• Human Capital Development: Weak implementation hampers long-term workforce competitiveness.
• Credibility of Skill Ecosystem:Raises questions about execution capacity of large-scale skilling programmes.
• Parliamentary Oversight: Highlights importance of PAC–CAG synergy in ensuring fiscal discipline.
• Federal Coordination:Suggests need for stronger Centre–State convergence in skill development initiatives.

Conclusion

The PAC’s observations on SANKALP highlight that allocation without effective implementation yields limited outcomes.

For India to harness its demographic advantage, skill development schemes must shift from expenditure-driven models to performance-oriented governance.

Robust monitoring, accountability, and institutional strengthening are essential to ensure that public funds translate into employable skills and sustainable livelihoods.

Prelims Question

Q.With reference to the Public Accounts Committee (PAC), consider the following statements:

1. The PAC examines CAG reports related to government expenditure.
2. The PAC has executive authority to penalize government officials.
3. The Chairperson of the PAC is appointed by the Speaker of the Lok Sabha.

How many of the above statements are correct?

(a) Only one(b) Only two(c) Only three(d) None

Answer: (b)

Mains Question

Q.Discuss the role of the Comptroller and Auditor General (CAG) and the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) in ensuring financial accountability in India. In light of the SANKALP scheme audit, examine the challenges in translating budgetary allocations into effective outcomes.

5. India Unveils Sovereign AI Models at India AI Impact Summit 2026

Why in News?

• On 20 February 2026, India unveiled three Sovereign AI Models at the India AI Impact Summit 2026 as part of its effort to build India-first artificial intelligence capabilities.
• These models operate under the ₹10,372 crore IndiaAI Mission, approved in March 2024, which seeks to create domestic foundational models, compute infrastructure, and public AI applications.

What are Sovereign AI Models?

• Sovereign AI models refer to artificial intelligence systems that are developed, trained, deployed, and governed within a country’s jurisdiction.
• Unlike global AI systems dominated by foreign Big Tech companies, sovereign AI ensures:

Domestic control over datasets Local storage and processing infrastructure National regulatory oversightStrategic autonomy in critical digital technologies

This aligns AI development with national security, data protection laws, and public interest objectives.

Key Pillars of India’s Sovereign AI Framework

1. Domestic Data Governance

• Training datasets are sourced, curated, stored, and processed within Indian jurisdiction.
• This reduces risks of data exfiltration, foreign surveillance, and external dependency.
• It also ensures that Indian linguistic, socio-cultural, and governance realities are reflected in AI systems.

2. Indigenous Compute Infrastructure

• The IndiaAI Mission supports large-scale GPU clusters and sovereign cloud systems.Startups and researchers receive subsidised compute access.
• This reduces dependence on foreign hyperscale cloud providers.

3. National Regulatory Oversight

• AI systems operate under India’s cybersecurity standards, emerging data protection laws, and Responsible AI frameworks.
• This allows India to shape AI governance consistent with democratic values and digital rights.

4. Strategic Technological Autonomy

• By building foundational Large Language Models (LLMs) and multimodal AI models domestically, India reduces reliance on proprietary foreign systems.
• This is crucial in a geopolitically fragmented technological landscape.

The Three Sovereign AI Models Unveiled

Sarvam AISarvam AI introduced two Large Language Models (LLMs):A 30-billion-parameter model and a 105-billion-parameter model, both trained from scratch in India using domestic datasets and indigenous compute infrastructure. The models focus on Indian languages, governance applications, and public sector digital services. Their applications include government chatbots, multilingual citizen interfaces, enterprise AI solutions, and public service delivery systems. This initiative signifies India’s growing capability to develop high-parameter foundational AI models comparable to leading global systems, thereby strengthening technological self-reliance and digital sovereignty.Gnani.aiGnani.ai specializes in voice-first AI systems designed to address India’s linguistic diversity. It offers advanced Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) with less than 5% Word Error Rate in Indian languages, along with real-time voice biometrics, anti-spoofing mechanisms, zero-shot voice cloning, and human-in-the-loop escalation systems. Its applications span banking customer service automation, telecom support systems, voice-enabled e-governance platforms, and rural digital inclusion through voice interfaces. Given India’s large non-English speaking population and rising voice-based digital adoption, Gnani.ai enhances accessibility, security, and financial inclusion.BharatGenBharatGen is a multilingual generative AI system developed through a consortium-based model to strengthen indigenous AI capabilities. It supports all 22 scheduled Indian languages and is currently operational in more than 15 languages, covering text, speech, and vision modalities trained on Indian datasets. Its applications include education technology, research assistance, government documentation translation, and inclusive digital service delivery. BharatGen directly addresses India’s linguistic diversity challenge in AI and promotes equitable access to digital technologies across regions and communities.

Challenges Ahead

• Training large models requires significant power and GPU capacity.
• India needs more advanced AI researchers and chip designers.
• Sovereign AI systems become high-value strategic assets vulnerable to cyberattacks.
• Need to prevent misuse such as deepfakes, misinformation, and AI bias.
• Rapid advancements by US and Chinese AI giants intensify pressure.

Conclusion

The unveiling of sovereign AI models marks a transition from India being primarily an AI service provider to becoming a foundational AI developer.

Through the IndiaAI Mission, India seeks to align innovation with sovereignty, inclusion, and strategic autonomy.

The long-term success of this initiative will shape India’s role in the global AI power hierarchy and determine whether it can emerge as a trusted democratic AI leader.

Prelims Question

Q.With reference to India’s Sovereign AI initiative, consider the following statements:

1. Sovereign AI models are trained and governed within national jurisdiction.
2. The IndiaAI Mission is implemented by the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology.
3. BharatGen supports multilingual generative AI across multiple Indian languages.

How many of the above statements are correct?

(a) Only one(b) Only two(c) Only three(d) None

Answer: (c)

Mains Question

Q.Discuss the concept of Sovereign AI in the context of emerging technological geopolitics. Evaluate how India’s IndiaAI Mission contributes to technological self-reliance and inclusive digital governance.

5.India’s Drone Ecosystem 2026: UAV Growth, Policy Reforms and Public Service Transformation

Why in News?

As of February 2026, India has developed a rapidly expanding and regulated drone ecosystem, with:

• 38,500+ registered drones (UIN)• 39,890 DGCA-certified remote pilots• 244 approved training organisations

Drone technology has become a core enabler of efficient public service delivery and national security operations, integrated into major government schemes such as SVAMITVA and PMFBY.

What Are UAVs?

Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), commonly known as drones, are aircraft that operate without a human pilot onboard.

They can function:

• Remotely via ground control stations• Autonomously using pre-programmed routes• Through AI-enabled navigation and sensor systems

UAVs combine aviation, robotics, GPS, AI, and real-time data transmission technologies.

Classification of UAVs

Based on Size

• Micro and Nano UAVsSmall quadcopters used for local surveillance, photography, and short-range operations.
• Tactical UAVsMedium-sized drones used for reconnaissance and border patrol.
• Strategic/Combat UAVsLong-endurance drones with combat capabilities (e.g., MQ-9 Reaper, Bayraktar TB-2).

Based on Function

• Surveillance UAVs: Used for intelligence gathering and security monitoring.
• Combat UAVs (UCAVs): Armed drones capable of carrying missiles or precision-guided munitions.
• Logistics UAVs: Used for transporting medicines, supplies, or equipment in remote regions.
• Commercial UAVs: Used in agriculture, mapping, cinematography, and delivery services.

Based on Operational Range

Short-Range UAVs: Operate within a few kilometers for local monitoring.Medium-Range UAVs: Operate within 100–300 km for tactical operations.Long-Endurance UAVs: Remain airborne for 24 hours or more for strategic missions.

Policy Framework for Drone Development Drone Rules, 2021

The Drone Rules, 2021 significantly liberalised India’s drone ecosystem by:

• Reducing forms from 25 to 5• Cutting approval requirements from 72 to 4• Rationalising fees• Declaring nearly 90% of Indian airspace as Green Zone (up to 400 feet)

Strategic Significance

• Economic Multiplier: Boosts manufacturing, start-ups, and high-tech employment.
• Agricultural Efficiency: Enhances productivity and reduces input costs.
• Governance Transparency: Improves monitoring of public projects and land records.
• Security Preparedness: Strengthens border and internal surveillance capabilities.
• Technological Self-Reliance: Reduces dependence on foreign drone imports.

Key Challenges

• Small UAVs used for smuggling arms and narcotics across borders.
• Countries like Bangladesh and Pakistan deploying advanced UAV systems.
• Drone incursions may trigger diplomatic tensions.
• Anti-drone missiles are expensive relative to low-cost UAV threats.
• Vulnerabilities in drone communication systems.

Conclusion

India’s drone ecosystem represents a convergence of regulatory reform, industrial policy, and governance innovation.

Through simplified Drone Rules, PLI incentives, GST rationalisation, and Digital Sky integration, India has moved from restrictive regulation to proactive enablement.

If security risks and technological gaps are managed effectively, drones will remain central to India’s public service transformation, agricultural modernization, and national security architecture.

Prelims Question

Q. With reference to India’s drone ecosystem, consider the following statements:

1. The Drone Rules, 2021 reduced approval requirements and simplified regulatory procedures.
2. Nearly 90% of Indian airspace has been designated as a Green Zone for drone operations up to 400 feet.
3. The Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme for drones aims to promote domestic manufacturing.

How many of the above statements are correct?

(a) Only one(b) Only two(c) Only three(d) None

Answer: (c)

Mains Question

Q. Discuss the role of drone technology in transforming public service delivery in India. Examine the regulatory reforms and security challenges associated with the expansion of India’s UAV ecosystem.